-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28485/#review77122
-----------------------------------------------------------



3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/address.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/28485/#comment125013>

    Just curious, what's the IPv6 story here? Do you need a LOCALHOST_ANY_V6() 
in the future?



3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/address.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/28485/#comment125014>

    Returning `const Address&` to a static variable is problematic during 
teardown in a multi-threaded enviornment because it'll be destructed while some 
thread might still be using it.
    
    So please return a copy or use a pointer for the static local variable.


- Jie Yu


On March 19, 2015, 7:23 p.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28485/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 19, 2015, 7:23 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Niklas Nielsen.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This makes it clearer when we intend to bind on a specific ip:port 
> (socket.bind(node)) and when we just want to bind to any local port 
> (socket.bind()).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/address.hpp 
> 0f0a577bd1b8940f71fc486dcb1be7aa55d57ab2 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/socket.hpp 
> 2c4258775bd90f91f1922a3cf2bb4ddf5c334881 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp 
> e7b029ba97e640c2102548c190ba62b30602f43d 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28485/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joris Van Remoortere
> 
>

Reply via email to