> On March 19, 2015, 10:27 p.m., Jie Yu wrote: > > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/address.hpp, lines 34-38 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/28485/diff/4/?file=900318#file900318line34> > > > > Just curious, what's the IPv6 story here? Do you need a > > LOCALHOST_ANY_V6() in the future?
from what I understand: IPv4 vs IPv6 will be abstracted away from Address (into IP). Depending on if this is environment variable based or not, we may or may not need a second function. - Joris ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28485/#review77122 ----------------------------------------------------------- On March 20, 2015, 6:24 p.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/28485/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 20, 2015, 6:24 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Niklas Nielsen. > > > Bugs: MESOS-2527 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2527 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > This makes it clearer when we intend to bind on a specific ip:port > (socket.bind(node)) and when we just want to bind to any local port > (socket.bind()). > > > Diffs > ----- > > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/address.hpp > 0f0a577bd1b8940f71fc486dcb1be7aa55d57ab2 > 3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/socket.hpp > 2c4258775bd90f91f1922a3cf2bb4ddf5c334881 > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp > e7b029ba97e640c2102548c190ba62b30602f43d > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28485/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Joris Van Remoortere > >
