> On March 24, 2015, 7:25 a.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> > include/mesos/mesos.proto, line 397
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/32139/diff/2/?file=899198#file899198line397>
> >
> >     Not sure this is the right place to comment on the valid specifications 
> > of both role and reservation. There is a user guide added right? We should 
> > refer to that instead.

Hm, the user guide doesn't exist in the repo. Maybe we just say something like: 
"Refer to the reservations user guide for the valid states and transitions of 
(role, reservation) pair." and add in the links together with the user guide 
later?


> On March 24, 2015, 7:25 a.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> > include/mesos/mesos.proto, line 428
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/32139/diff/2/?file=899198#file899198line428>
> >
> >     It also can be unreserved as well?

If the `reservation` is not set, it's either "statically reserved" or 
"unreserved". I cheated here by saying "statically configured", perhaps that's 
confusing. I'll explicitly mention "statically reserved" and "unreserved".


- Michael


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32139/#review77536
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 18, 2015, 7:43 p.m., Michael Park wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/32139/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 18, 2015, 7:43 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Ben Mahler, and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2475
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2475
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The beginning of `Resource::ReservationInfo`. This patch only introduces the 
> `framework_id` field. We don't need the required `principal` field yet and 
> will be introduced together with the "unreserve" ACLs. An optional `id` may 
> be introduced in the future as well.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto ec8efaec13f54a56d82411f6cdbdb8ad8b103748 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32139/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Michael Park
> 
>

Reply via email to