-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/33249/#review80350
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/tests/containerizer.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33249/#comment130199>

    How about setting a flag in the TestContainerizer constructor that tells it 
to send a failure on launch? Checking value like is too implicit, and someone 
else might not know the magic meaning on the other side (as I don't see any 
comment in the test to mark that this has sepecial meaning).


- Timothy Chen


On April 16, 2015, 3:16 p.m., Jay Buffington wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/33249/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 16, 2015, 3:16 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Timothy Chen, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2020
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2020
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> When mesos is unable to launch the containerizer the scheduler should
> get a TASK_FAILED with a status message that includes the error the
> containerizer encounted when trying to launch.
> 
> Introduces a new TaskStatus: REASON_CONTAINERIZER_LAUNCH_FAILED
> 
> Fixes MESOS-2020
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 3a8e8bf303e0576c212951f6028af77e54d93537 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp a0595f93ce4720f5b9926326d01210460ccb0667 
>   src/tests/containerizer.cpp 26b87ac6b16dfeaf84888e80296ef540697bd775 
>   src/tests/slave_tests.cpp b826000e0a4221690f956ea51f49ad4c99d5e188 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33249/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I added test case to slave_test.cpp.  I also tried this with Aurora, supplied 
> a bogus docker image url and saw the "docker pull" failure stderr message in 
> Aurora's web UI.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jay Buffington
> 
>

Reply via email to