Re: `F()` vs `F(void)`

[Jie Yu]

+1

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Michael Park <mp...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> In the C++ world, the *void* parameter is considered to be only there for C
> compatibility reasons.
>
> We do a good job of not using *void *parameters in function declarations,
> e.g., *void F();*. On the other hand, we're *not* so good doing so for
> function types, e.g., *std::function<void(void)>*.
>
> I would like to see the codebase converge to *not* use *void* as a
> parameter type, and would like feedback if anyone holds strong opposing
> opinions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> MPark.
>