`void` parameters are no longer with us. https://github.com/apache/mesos/commit/93a5708294d6d66a5e1350a0bb1c8fe87605ee1d https://github.com/apache/mesos/commit/05f9fb2fa66968f37418d28fc8cebd0770a54dca https://github.com/apache/mesos/commit/4d4d7166414f0ebd8d5e40df34070446098a3c91
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:36 AM Alexander Rojas <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > > On 13 Dec 2015, at 19:46, Michael Park <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > In the C++ world, the *void* parameter is considered to be only there > for C > > compatibility reasons. > > > > We do a good job of not using *void *parameters in function declarations, > > e.g., *void F();*. On the other hand, we're *not* so good doing so for > > function types, e.g., *std::function<void(void)>*. > > > > I would like to see the codebase converge to *not* use *void* as a > > parameter type, and would like feedback if anyone holds strong opposing > > opinions. > > > > Thanks, > > > > MPark. > >
