+1 On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:36 PM Anand Mazumdar <[email protected]> wrote:
> Are you referring to the spread sheet linked in MESOS-2604 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2604>? > > AFAICT, it just shows that a particular variant of GCC 4.8+ is available > on each of the supported distributions. So, this should not be an issue > unless I am missing something? > > -anand > > > On Jan 4, 2016, at 5:42 PM, Benjamin Mahler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > When we moved to 4.8 there was a spreadsheet that showed how folks can > get > > 4.8 on various distributions, have you checked that 4.8.1 is available > > across distributions? > > > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Adam Bordelon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Joris Van Remoortere < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 (binding) > >>> > >>> I would like to propose that we bump our minimum supported version for > >> gcc > >>>> from 4.8.0 to 4.8.1. The main motivation behind this is that there are > >> at > >>>> least 2 outstanding reviews on RB that want to use ref-qualifiers < > >>>> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2439.htm> > >>>> introduced in GCC 4.8.1. The reviews in question are r41870 < > >>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/41870> and r41593 < > >>>> > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/41593/diff/2?file=1173648#file1173648line58 > >>>> . > >>>> > >>>> Also, our Getting Started document < > >>>> http://mesos.apache.org/gettingstarted/> for Mesos already lists the > >>>> minimum gcc version as > 4.8. Looking at the release timeline < > >>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/> for GCC, it seems that 4.8.0/4.8.1 were > >>>> released within a week of each other. > >>>> > >>>> Does anyone have a strong opinion against this change ? > >>>> > >>>> -anand > >>>> > >>> > >> > >
