+1 On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Michael Park <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:36 PM Anand Mazumdar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Are you referring to the spread sheet linked in MESOS-2604 < > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2604>? > > > > AFAICT, it just shows that a particular variant of GCC 4.8+ is available > > on each of the supported distributions. So, this should not be an issue > > unless I am missing something? > > > > -anand > > > > > On Jan 4, 2016, at 5:42 PM, Benjamin Mahler <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > When we moved to 4.8 there was a spreadsheet that showed how folks can > > get > > > 4.8 on various distributions, have you checked that 4.8.1 is available > > > across distributions? > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Adam Bordelon <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> +1 > > >> > > >> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Joris Van Remoortere < > > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >>> +1 (binding) > > >>> > > >>> I would like to propose that we bump our minimum supported version > for > > >> gcc > > >>>> from 4.8.0 to 4.8.1. The main motivation behind this is that there > are > > >> at > > >>>> least 2 outstanding reviews on RB that want to use ref-qualifiers < > > >>>> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2439.htm> > > >>>> introduced in GCC 4.8.1. The reviews in question are r41870 < > > >>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/41870> and r41593 < > > >>>> > > >> > > https://reviews.apache.org/r/41593/diff/2?file=1173648#file1173648line58 > > >>>> . > > >>>> > > >>>> Also, our Getting Started document < > > >>>> http://mesos.apache.org/gettingstarted/> for Mesos already lists > the > > >>>> minimum gcc version as > 4.8. Looking at the release timeline < > > >>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/> for GCC, it seems that 4.8.0/4.8.1 > were > > >>>> released within a week of each other. > > >>>> > > >>>> Does anyone have a strong opinion against this change ? > > >>>> > > >>>> -anand > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > >
