I'll be happy to shepherd.

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Michael Browning <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Bump. This should be a pretty small change, any takers?
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Shuai Lin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > +1 for the new `filename` field for the URI. It would also be useful for
> > implementing base64:// or data:// scheme uri fetcher, so that the
> scheduler
> > can pass arbitary file blobs to the task directly without resorting to a
> > custom executor. (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4524)
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Michael Browning <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Looking for a shepherd for this task:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4735
> >>
> >> As Zhitao mentioned in the ticket, the frequently-encountered
> >> inability to extract archives from webhdfs-fetched files due to the
> >> inclusion of things like query params in the resulting filename is
> >> kind of a blocker for us, and there seems to be interest from others
> >> too, q.v.:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4779
> >>
> >> My proposed fix is basically that proposed by Erik in the ticket: add
> >> an optional string `filename` field to the CommandInfo.URI protobuf --
> >> when omitted, the old behavior will be retained, but when specified
> >> the file will be saved to the sandbox with that filename. Any feedback
> >> would be appreciated.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Michael
> >>
>

Reply via email to