@Kevin:

FYI, it's best practice to use a commit SHA in GitHub links so that future
readers are seeing the content you intended.

i.e., instead of:

   -
   
https://github.com/NVIDIA/nvidia-docker/blob/master/tools/src/nvidia/volumes.go#L109

It's best to do:

   -
   
https://github.com/NVIDIA/nvidia-docker/blob/101b436c89c3a74e9a3025a104587b6612d903d8/tools/src/nvidia/volumes.go#L109


And (awesomely!) GitHub makes it trivial to do this!  [1]

   - when you're looking at a file (such as the original link you pasted),
   just type "y" and GitHub will redirect to the latest commit in master:

- Erik

[1] https://help.github.com/articles/getting-permanent-links-to-files/

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Kevin Klues <[email protected]> wrote:

> For now we've decided to actually remove the hard dependence on libelf
> for the 1.0 release and spend a bit more time thinking about the right
> way to pull it in.
>
> Jean, to answer your question though -- someone would still need to
> consolidate these libraries, even if it wasn't left to Mesos to do so.
> These libraries are spread across the file system, and need to be
> pulled into a single place for easy injection. The full list of
> binaries / libraries are here:
>
>
> https://github.com/NVIDIA/nvidia-docker/blob/master/tools/src/nvidia/volumes.go#L109
>
> We could put this burden on the operator and trust he gets it right,
> or we could have Mesos programmatically do it itself. We considered
> just leveraging the nvidia-docker-plugin itself (instead of
> duplicating its functionality into mesos), but ultimately decided it
> was better not to introduce an external dependency on it (since it is
> a separate running excutable, rather than a simple library, like
> libelf).
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Jean Christophe “JC” Martin
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > As an operator not using GPUs, I feel that the burden seems misplaced,
> and disproportionate.
> > I assume that the operator of a GPU cluster knows the location of the
> libraries based on their OS, and could potentially provide this information
> at the time of creating the containers. I am not sure to see why this
> something that mesos is required to do (consolidating the libraries in the
> volume, versus being a configuration/external information).
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > JC
> >
> >> On Jun 20, 2016, at 2:30 PM, Kevin Klues <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sorry, the ticket just links to the nvidia-docker project without much
> >> further explanation. The information at the link below should make it
> >> a bit more clear:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/NVIDIA/nvidia-docker/wiki/NVIDIA-driver.
> >>
> >> The crux of the issue is that we need to be able consolidate all of
> >> the Nvidia binaries/libraries into a single volume that we inject into
> >> a docker container.  We use libelf is used to get the canonical names
> >> of all the Nvidia libraries (i.e. SONAME in their dynamic sections) as
> >> well as lookup what external dependences they have (i.e. NEEDED in
> >> their dynamic sections) in order to build this volume.
> >>
> >> NOTE: None of this volume support is actually in Mesos yet -- we just
> >> added the libelf dependence in anticipation of it.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Yan Xu <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> It's not immediately clear form the ticket why the change from optional
> >>> dependency to required dependency though? Could you summarize?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Kevin Klues <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks Zhitao,
> >>>>
> >>>> I just pushed out a review for upgrades.md and added you as a
> reviewer.
> >>>>
> >>>> The new dependence was added in the JIRA that haosdent linked, but the
> >>>> actual reason for adding the dependence is more related to:
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5401
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 9:34 AM, haosdent <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>> The related issue is Change build to always enable Nvidia GPU support
> >>>>> for
> >>>>> Linux
> >>>>> Last time my local build break before Kevin send out the email, and
> then
> >>>>> find this change.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Zhitao Li <[email protected]>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Kevin,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks for letting us know. It seems like this is not called out in
> >>>>>> upgrades.md, so can you please document this additional dependency
> >>>>>> there?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Also, can you include the link to the JIRA or patch requiring this
> >>>>>> dependency so we can have some contexts?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Kevin Klues <[email protected]>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hello all,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Just an FYI that the newest libmesos now has an external dependence
> >>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>> libelf on Linux. This dependence can be installed via the following
> >>>>>>> packages:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> CentOS 6/7:     yum install elfutils-libelf.x86_64
> >>>>>>> Ubuntu14.04:   apt-get install libelf1
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Alternatively you can install from source:
> >>>>>>> https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Libelf
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> For developers, you will also need to install the libelf headers in
> >>>>>>> order to build master. This dependency can be installed via:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> CentOS: elfutils-libelf-devel.x86_64
> >>>>>>> Ubuntu: libelf-dev
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Alternatively, you can install from source:
> >>>>>>> https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Libelf
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The getting started guide and the support/docker_build.sh scripts
> >>>>>>> have
> >>>>>>> been updated appropriately, but you may need to update your local
> >>>>>>> environment if you don't yet have these packages installed.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> ~Kevin
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Zhitao Li
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>> Haosdent Huang
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> ~Kevin
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> ~Kevin
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ~Kevin
>

Reply via email to