IIUC this wouldn't necessarily rule out RB reviews just better support for
Github PRs?

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 9:13 PM Andrew Schwartzmeyer <
and...@schwartzmeyer.com> wrote:

> GitHub PR code reviews have gotten _significantly_ better over the last
> two years. You can actually open addressable issues now (like
> ReviewBoard), and assign reviewers, and "officially" mark it as
> signed-off (ship-it) too. They used to suck so bad that I preferred
> inline email comments to PRs, but they've improved.
>
> On 06/22/2018 9:01 pm, James Peach wrote:
> >> On Jun 22, 2018, at 7:34 PM, Jie Yu <yujie....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Does this means we can add CI webhooks to the git repo?
> >
> > FWIW, I'm hugely -1 on doing code reviews on GitHub. I'm cautiously
> > optimistic about other kinds of integration though.
> >
> >> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:45 PM, James Peach <jor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Jun 20, 2018, at 7:58 PM, Vinod Kone <vinodk...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi folks,
> >>>>
> >>>> Looks like ASF now supports <https://gitbox.apache.org/> giving
> >>>> write
> >>>> access to committers for their GitHub mirrors, which means we can
> >>>> merge
> >>> PRs
> >>>> directly on GitHub!
> >>>
> >>> Are you proposing that we move to Github generally?
> >>>
> >>>> FWICT, this requires us moving our repo to a new gitbox server by
> >>>> filing
> >>> an
> >>>> INFRA ticket. We probably need to update our CI and other tooling
> >>>> that
> >>>> references our git repo directly, so there will be work involved on
> >>>> our
> >>> end
> >>>> as well.
> >>>>
> >>>> This has been one of the long requested features from several
> >>>> committers,
> >>>> so I'm gauging interest to see if folks think we should go down this
> >>> route
> >>>> (several projects seem to be already moving
> >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=text%20~%20%22gitbox%22>)
> >>> too.
> >>>>
> >>>> If there is enough interest, we could start a vote.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Vinod
> >>>
> >>>
>

Reply via email to