IIUC this wouldn't necessarily rule out RB reviews just better support for Github PRs?
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 9:13 PM Andrew Schwartzmeyer < and...@schwartzmeyer.com> wrote: > GitHub PR code reviews have gotten _significantly_ better over the last > two years. You can actually open addressable issues now (like > ReviewBoard), and assign reviewers, and "officially" mark it as > signed-off (ship-it) too. They used to suck so bad that I preferred > inline email comments to PRs, but they've improved. > > On 06/22/2018 9:01 pm, James Peach wrote: > >> On Jun 22, 2018, at 7:34 PM, Jie Yu <yujie....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> Does this means we can add CI webhooks to the git repo? > > > > FWIW, I'm hugely -1 on doing code reviews on GitHub. I'm cautiously > > optimistic about other kinds of integration though. > > > >> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:45 PM, James Peach <jor...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>>> On Jun 20, 2018, at 7:58 PM, Vinod Kone <vinodk...@apache.org> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi folks, > >>>> > >>>> Looks like ASF now supports <https://gitbox.apache.org/> giving > >>>> write > >>>> access to committers for their GitHub mirrors, which means we can > >>>> merge > >>> PRs > >>>> directly on GitHub! > >>> > >>> Are you proposing that we move to Github generally? > >>> > >>>> FWICT, this requires us moving our repo to a new gitbox server by > >>>> filing > >>> an > >>>> INFRA ticket. We probably need to update our CI and other tooling > >>>> that > >>>> references our git repo directly, so there will be work involved on > >>>> our > >>> end > >>>> as well. > >>>> > >>>> This has been one of the long requested features from several > >>>> committers, > >>>> so I'm gauging interest to see if folks think we should go down this > >>> route > >>>> (several projects seem to be already moving > >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=text%20~%20%22gitbox%22>) > >>> too. > >>>> > >>>> If there is enough interest, we could start a vote. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Vinod > >>> > >>> >