> On June 5, 2015, 1:40 p.m., Tomasz Guzialek wrote:
> > pom.xml, line 67
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/35123/diff/2/?file=979940#file979940line67>
> >
> >     Isn't HDFS a better name? Name Hadoop brings also the processing 
> > framework to the game.
> 
> Kasper Sørensen wrote:
>     I was thinking of doing it this way so that other hadoop-client related 
> utilities could be put in here. And then it also makes sense to let e.g. the 
> hbase module depend on this module and have it's dependencies managed from 
> here.

I cannot think immediately about a good example of such a utility. HBase is 
related to Hadoop as well, but it has its own module - I believe future 
additions to MM in Hadoop universe will also have a separate module. That's a 
minor naming thing, though - "hadoop" name is fair enough :).


- Tomasz


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35123/#review86793
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 5, 2015, 1:30 p.m., Kasper Sørensen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/35123/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 5, 2015, 1:30 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for MetaModel.
> 
> 
> Bugs: METAMODEL-148
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METAMODEL-148
> 
> 
> Repository: metamodel
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This more or less fixes METAMODEL-148.
> 
> Items I am not sure about:
> 
>  * I am not sure if we can implement the isReadOnly() method in any sensible 
> way?
>  * I wanted to have as little client-side configuration as possible, so I 
> create the hadoop Configuration on-the-fly. Maybe it would be good also with 
> an option to load it from a hadoop conf XML file?
>  * I updated also hbase to the latest version, but that created a lot of 
> deprecation warnings, so I should probably rather just leave it alone :-P
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/main/java/org/apache/metamodel/util/Func.java 684411f 
>   core/src/main/java/org/apache/metamodel/util/UncheckedFunc.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   hadoop/.gitignore PRE-CREATION 
>   hadoop/pom.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   hadoop/src/main/java/org/apache/metamodel/util/HdfsResource.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   hadoop/src/test/java/org/apache/metamodel/util/HdfsResourceTest.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   hbase/pom.xml b3ded40 
>   hbase/src/main/java/org/apache/metamodel/hbase/HBaseDataContext.java 
> a501790 
>   pom.xml 5cb93f3 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35123/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Only local testing. And monkey tested it with my own HDFS setup.
> Probably needs a formal integration test.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kasper Sørensen
> 
>

Reply via email to