+1

Regards
Ankit

> On 25 Oct 2015, at 16:19, Kasper Sørensen <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Maybe we should revive this discussion now a week later? It's been a good
> active week with 3-4 issues resolved. Our CHANGES.md has the unreleased
> updates lined up:
> 
> * [METAMODEL-198] - Fixed support for JDBC TIMESTAMP precision to match
> the underlying database's precision.
> * [METAMODEL-200] - Added optional "APPROXIMATE" keyword to query syntax
> for aggregate functions.
> * [METAMODEL-144] - Automated binary packaging of the MetaModel project.
> * [METAMODEL-197] - ElasticSearch schema update/change after CREATE TABLE
> statements.
> * [METAMODEL-199] - Fixed a bug in query parser when parsing two
> consecutive WHERE items with parentheses around them.
> 
> We even have two minor PRs pending which we could also add (MongoDB version
> update and a build/travis improvement).
> 
> For me this is enough to justify a 4.4.1 release. What do you think?
> 
> Best regards,
> Kasper
> 
> 
> 2015-10-20 8:36 GMT+02:00 Alberto Rodriguez <[email protected]>:
> 
>> Personally, I'd wait until we include more changes, for me it does not make
>> much sense to release a new version including just one bugfix.
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> 
>> Alberto
>> 
>> 2015-10-19 23:13 GMT+02:00 Kasper Sørensen <[email protected]
>>> :
>> 
>>> Actually it's not long since we released 4.4.0 and I think there is only
>>> one bugfix made since it (namely METAMODEL-198 which we merged today).
>>> 
>>> But anyways I am always fine with making minor releases as long as we are
>>> happy with the state of the code. For me not important, but also no
>> issues
>>> with releasing 4.4.1.
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Kasper
>>> 
>>> 2015-10-19 22:41 GMT+02:00 Ankit Kumar <[email protected]>:
>>> 
>>>> Hi All,
>>>> 
>>>> Wanted to initiate a discussion for the next release for Metamodel
>>> v4.4.2.
>>>> There are some new additions to the library and also quite some bug
>> fixes
>>>> made.
>>>> 
>>>> Should we plan a minor release any time soon?
>>>> 
>>>> Regards
>>>> Ankit
>> 

Reply via email to