OK I will stage a release.

2015-10-26 8:59 GMT+01:00 Alberto Rodriguez <[email protected]>:

> I think the changes made last week do justify a new release.
>
> I'd go ahead.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Alberto
>
> 2015-10-25 17:17 GMT+01:00 Ankit Kumar <[email protected]>:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Regards
> > Ankit
> >
> > > On 25 Oct 2015, at 16:19, Kasper Sørensen <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Maybe we should revive this discussion now a week later? It's been a
> good
> > > active week with 3-4 issues resolved. Our CHANGES.md has the unreleased
> > > updates lined up:
> > >
> > > * [METAMODEL-198] - Fixed support for JDBC TIMESTAMP precision to match
> > > the underlying database's precision.
> > > * [METAMODEL-200] - Added optional "APPROXIMATE" keyword to query
> syntax
> > > for aggregate functions.
> > > * [METAMODEL-144] - Automated binary packaging of the MetaModel
> project.
> > > * [METAMODEL-197] - ElasticSearch schema update/change after CREATE
> TABLE
> > > statements.
> > > * [METAMODEL-199] - Fixed a bug in query parser when parsing two
> > > consecutive WHERE items with parentheses around them.
> > >
> > > We even have two minor PRs pending which we could also add (MongoDB
> > version
> > > update and a build/travis improvement).
> > >
> > > For me this is enough to justify a 4.4.1 release. What do you think?
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Kasper
> > >
> > >
> > > 2015-10-20 8:36 GMT+02:00 Alberto Rodriguez <[email protected]>:
> > >
> > >> Personally, I'd wait until we include more changes, for me it does not
> > make
> > >> much sense to release a new version including just one bugfix.
> > >>
> > >> Kind regards,
> > >>
> > >> Alberto
> > >>
> > >> 2015-10-19 23:13 GMT+02:00 Kasper Sørensen <
> > [email protected]
> > >>> :
> > >>
> > >>> Actually it's not long since we released 4.4.0 and I think there is
> > only
> > >>> one bugfix made since it (namely METAMODEL-198 which we merged
> today).
> > >>>
> > >>> But anyways I am always fine with making minor releases as long as we
> > are
> > >>> happy with the state of the code. For me not important, but also no
> > >> issues
> > >>> with releasing 4.4.1.
> > >>>
> > >>> Best regards,
> > >>> Kasper
> > >>>
> > >>> 2015-10-19 22:41 GMT+02:00 Ankit Kumar <[email protected]>:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi All,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Wanted to initiate a discussion for the next release for Metamodel
> > >>> v4.4.2.
> > >>>> There are some new additions to the library and also quite some bug
> > >> fixes
> > >>>> made.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Should we plan a minor release any time soon?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards
> > >>>> Ankit
> > >>
> >
>

Reply via email to