That too. But it requires MetaModel-core to be released first so that the right dependency can be set. Another good reason for this RC :-)
Kasper Sørensen > On Aug 15, 2017, at 04:49, Jörg Unbehauen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > what about metamodel-extras? > > I guess this will require some attention. > > > Best, Jörg > > >> Am 15.08.17 um 07:56 schrieb Kasper Sørensen: >> Hi all, >> >> I'll be staging and putting out a VOTE soon for another RC version of >> MetaModel 5. With the recent change that added METAMODEL-7 (use of >> collections over arrays in public APIs) I think a new RC version is highly >> needed to validate the library in downstream products such as Membrane, >> MetaModel-extras etc. >> >> But I also start to think that from an API change point of view, the v5 >> stuff is coming to an end. Is there anything else we need to add before we >> call 5.0 final? I would personally like to spend time on the Membrane >> project so that we can maybe release MetaModel 5.0 and Membrane 1.0 around >> the same time. Are there other issues that people need to be in there, or >> other timelines that need to be sync'ed? >> >> Best regards, >> Kasper >> >
