Hi Jörg (and others interested),

FYI, I've just released metamodel-extras v 5.0-RC4 also, which uses the
updated MM API.

Best regards,
Kasper

2017-08-15 18:28 GMT-07:00 Kasper Sørensen <i.am.kasper.soren...@gmail.com>:

> That too. But it requires MetaModel-core to be released first so that the
> right dependency can be set. Another good reason for this RC :-)
>
> Kasper Sørensen
>
> > On Aug 15, 2017, at 04:49, Jörg Unbehauen <unbeha...@informatik.uni-
> leipzig.de> wrote:
> >
> > what about metamodel-extras?
> >
> > I guess this will require some attention.
> >
> >
> > Best, Jörg
> >
> >
> >> Am 15.08.17 um 07:56 schrieb Kasper Sørensen:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I'll be staging and putting out a VOTE soon for another RC version of
> >> MetaModel 5. With the recent change that added METAMODEL-7 (use of
> >> collections over arrays in public APIs) I think a new RC version is
> highly
> >> needed to validate the library in downstream products such as Membrane,
> >> MetaModel-extras etc.
> >>
> >> But I also start to think that from an API change point of view, the v5
> >> stuff is coming to an end. Is there anything else we need to add before
> we
> >> call 5.0 final? I would personally like to spend time on the Membrane
> >> project so that we can maybe release MetaModel 5.0 and Membrane 1.0
> around
> >> the same time. Are there other issues that people need to be in there,
> or
> >> other timelines that need to be sync'ed?
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Kasper
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to