+1 for migrating away from the Wiki. I am not a fan.  It is too difficult
to keep in-sync with the source code.  It also doesn't get the loving care
and review that a PR does in our community.

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:27 PM, zeo...@gmail.com <zeo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I suggested in the past and got some buy in, but never had time to move
> everything into GitHub.  I vote to mostly or entirely archive the wiki.
>
> Jon
>
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017, 5:19 PM Laurens Vets <laur...@daemon.be> wrote:
>
> > On 2017-06-13 14:09, Otto Fowler wrote:
> > > I think there are things in the wiki that are very very out of date, to
> > > the
> > > extent that they are confusing people looking at Metron.
> > > Basically anyone going to DOCS HOME from the site is being thrown into
> > > documentation that is sure to confuse them.
> > >
> > > Does anyone have any ideas how we can address this?   Can we prune the
> > > wiki
> > > and remove the out of date information ( better less than wrong )?
> > > Should
> > > we replace DOCS HOME with the site book link?
> >
> > Throw out the old/wrong stuff asap.
> >
> > I also wouldn't mind trying to get some structure in it but is the wiki
> > still necessary if everything will be in markdown in the source
> > eventually?
> >
> --
>
> Jon
>

Reply via email to