Agreed. Some of the project management stuff and bylaws fit there, but let's get the misleading docs off and push the architecture and deployment stuff into the source base via site-book. That way we might just keep it consistent with versions.
Simon > On 19 Jun 2017, at 07:11, Casey Stella <ceste...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 to moving away from the wiki. I really don't like it. > >> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Justin Leet <justinjl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I'm mostly +1 for moving away from the wiki, and keeping things lined up >> with source. I do think it has a place though as a spot to put some Apache >> type stuff, and maybe link recordings of talks or meetups and such. >> >> On Jun 13, 2017 4:15 PM, "Nick Allen" <n...@nickallen.org> wrote: >> >> +1 for migrating away from the Wiki. I am not a fan. It is too difficult >> to keep in-sync with the source code. It also doesn't get the loving care >> and review that a PR does in our community. >> >> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:27 PM, zeo...@gmail.com <zeo...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I suggested in the past and got some buy in, but never had time to move >>> everything into GitHub. I vote to mostly or entirely archive the wiki. >>> >>> Jon >>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017, 5:19 PM Laurens Vets <laur...@daemon.be> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2017-06-13 14:09, Otto Fowler wrote: >>>>> I think there are things in the wiki that are very very out of date, >> to >>>>> the >>>>> extent that they are confusing people looking at Metron. >>>>> Basically anyone going to DOCS HOME from the site is being thrown >> into >>>>> documentation that is sure to confuse them. >>>>> >>>>> Does anyone have any ideas how we can address this? Can we prune >> the >>>>> wiki >>>>> and remove the out of date information ( better less than wrong )? >>>>> Should >>>>> we replace DOCS HOME with the site book link? >>>> >>>> Throw out the old/wrong stuff asap. >>>> >>>> I also wouldn't mind trying to get some structure in it but is the wiki >>>> still necessary if everything will be in markdown in the source >>>> eventually? >>>> >>> -- >>> >>> Jon >>> >>
