> The end goal is Ubuntu Ambari + Deb and full-dev-ubuntu right? That list sounds good to me.
(Plus, some way of dealing with Justin's point about support.) On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:11 AM Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com> wrote: > I’m ok if it is not. Suggesting because it is a series of prs. > > The end goal is Ubuntu Ambari + Deb and full-dev-ubuntu right? > > On December 15, 2017 at 10:03:23, Nick Allen (n...@nickallen.org) wrote: > > > This seems like a feature branch candidate. > > Personally, I don't see the need for a feature branch on this one. It > won't involve big, architectural changes. The touch points are > constrained. Everything that we currently have will continue to work as it > always had after each PR. If you feel strongly the other way, please > provide your reasoning to help me understand. > > > > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> This sounds awesome. The hortonworks article is getting older ever day. >> This seems like a feature branch candidate. >> >> On December 14, 2017 at 18:22:33, Nick Allen (n...@nickallen.org) wrote: >> >> I've done some work to get the MPack working on Ubuntu. I'd like to get >> that work packaged up and contributed back to Apache. I think it would be >> genuinly useful to the community. >> >> Here is how I was thinking about tackling that through a series of PRs. >> >> 1. Create the DEBs necessary for installing on Ubuntu. See PR #868. >> >> 2. Submit 3 or 4 separate PRs that enhance the existing MPack so that it >> works on both CentOS and Ubuntu. I honestly am not sure how many will fall >> out of the work that I've done, but I will try to chop it up logically so >> that it is easy to review. >> >> 3. Create a "Full Dev" equivalent for Ubuntu so that we can see the >> end-to-end install work for Ubuntu in an automated fashion. >> >> >> ** I do not expect developers to test their PRs on both CentOS and Ubuntu. >> I think the existing CentOS "Full Dev" should remain as the gold standard >> that we test PRs against. No changes there. >> >> Let me know if you have feedback or thoughts on this. >> >> Chao >> >> >
