I'm +1 on feature branch and user@ announcement as well. On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Casey Stella <ceste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 to both the feature branch and user@ announcement. > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 2:45 PM, Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 to the feature branch. > > > > Also, there have been some questions about solr support recently, I think > > when the feature branch > > is ready you should announce it on user@ too, we may get some help from > > folks looking for this. > > > > > > > > On January 18, 2018 at 14:26:14, Justin Leet (justinjl...@gmail.com) > > wrote: > > > > Now that we have ES at a modern version, we should consider bringing Solr > > to a modern version as well. > > > > The focus of this work would be to get us in a place where Solr is > > upgraded, along with the related work of building out the Solr > > functionality to parity with Elasticsearch. The goal would not be to add > > net new functionality, just to get Solr and ES in the same place for the > > alerts UI and REST interface. Additionally, it would include the various > > supporting necessities such as ensuring associated DAOs are testable, and > > so on. > > > > Given the testing, reviewing, and iteration involved, I'd like to propose > > doing this work in a feature in a feature branch. > > > > Jiras would be created based on this discussion once it dies down a bit. > > >
