Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/853
First, nice work.
Second, I have this question:
Since we will have some unknown number of rest clients, that may want to
save 'configuration' associated with a user, and not just Alerts UI, should it
not be factored more generically?
getUserSettingsForType()
And stored as user, type, settings byte[] or some such?
We may also want to store the version so that it is user, type,
settingsFmtVersion, settings.
We might also want to consider storing as Protobufs, which are more
supporting changes.
---
