I'm also inclined to drop them. They're in master and only exist to facilitate dev. It seems unlikely to be a common case where someone wants to really dig through the actual feature branch history rather than what ended up in master.
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 1:49 PM Casey Stella <ceste...@gmail.com> wrote: > I’d get rid of them. > On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 13:42 Michael Miklavcic < > michael.miklav...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > What are we doing with feature branches once they're complete and merged > > into master? Is our expectation that we'll keep feature branches in > > perpetuity, or should we plan to do some house cleaning once they've been > > merged? I did a quick check of NiFi and Kafka and don't see much by way > of > > feature branches in their repos. I see plenty of RC's in both the > branches > > and tags listings, but nothing FB related. In previous discussions, we > > talked quite a bit about us "trailblazing here," so it may be that this > is > > simply without much precedent and entirely for us to decide. I can > > definitely see value in maintaining them for future reference, as it does > > offer a nice bucket in which to collect the commits and discussion > nicely, > > but I wanted to get others' thoughts. > > > > Best, > > Mike > > >
