+1, I haven't seen any case where the split-join topology isn't made obsolete by the unified topology.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 6:17 PM Michael Miklavcic < michael.miklav...@gmail.com> wrote: > Fellow Metronians, > > We've had the unified enrichment topology around for a number of months > now, it has proved itself stable, and there is yet to be a time that I have > seen the split-join topology outperform the unified one. Here are some > simple reasons to deprecate the split-join topology. > > 1. Unified topology performs better. > 2. The configuration, especially for performance tuning is much, much > simpler in the unified model. > 3. The footprint within the cluster is smaller. > 4. One of the first activities for any install is that we spend time > instructing users to switch to the unified topology. > 5. One less moving part to maintain. > > I'd like to recommend that we deprecate the split-join topology and make > the unified enrichment topology the new default. > > Best, > Mike >
