+1

On Thu, Nov 1, 2018, 6:27 PM Justin Leet <justinjl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1, I haven't seen any case where the split-join topology isn't made
> obsolete by the unified topology.
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 6:17 PM Michael Miklavcic <
> michael.miklav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Fellow Metronians,
> >
> > We've had the unified enrichment topology around for a number of months
> > now, it has proved itself stable, and there is yet to be a time that I
> have
> > seen the split-join topology outperform the unified one. Here are some
> > simple reasons to deprecate the split-join topology.
> >
> >    1. Unified topology performs better.
> >    2. The configuration, especially for performance tuning is much, much
> >    simpler in the unified model.
> >    3. The footprint within the cluster is smaller.
> >    4. One of the first activities for any install is that we spend time
> >    instructing users to switch to the unified topology.
> >    5. One less moving part to maintain.
> >
> > I'd like to recommend that we deprecate the split-join topology and make
> > the unified enrichment topology the new default.
> >
> > Best,
> > Mike
> >
>

Reply via email to