That is a great idea! +1
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:19 AM Tibor Meller <tibor.mel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Shane, Thanks for gathering the information and raising this. > I also feel that our UIs reached a level of complexity what makes this to a > reasonable next step. > This complexity on the client side will grow in the future and I believe it > is better to prepare instead of trying to make huge refactorings later. > NgRx/Redux is quiet the industry standard architectural library in both > React and Angular realm. Pretty well known in the community. > I would be happy to move forward with NgRx. > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 3:44 PM Shane Ardell <shane.m.ard...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > What I'm referring to is roughly the entire contents of the UI > > application's memory. > > > > On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 6:29 PM Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Can you describe what you mean by “state” in a little more detail? > Not a > > > complete description, maybe just a crib list. > > > > > > > > > On November 22, 2018 at 07:21:43, Shane Ardell ( > shane.m.ard...@gmail.com > > ) > > > wrote: > > > > > > As both the Management and Alerts UI grow in size, managing application > > > state continues to become more and more complex. To help us deal with > > > managing all of this state and ensuring our application derives state > > from > > > a single source of truth, I suggest we start using NgRx, a state > > > management > > > library based on the Redux pattern but built for Angular. It is by far > > the > > > most popular library of this type for Angular. As you can see in the > > > project's GitHub Insights tab <https://github.com/ngrx/platform/pulse > >, > > > it's quite actively worked on and releases are pretty frequent. The > > > project > > > is licensed under MIT. > > > > > > As far as an approach to integration, I don't think we necessarily > need a > > > big refactoring right off the bat. I feel something like this can be > done > > > in a piecemeal approach over time. I think we can start by introducing > it > > > into the project the next time we have a new application feature. > > > > > > What are everyone's thoughts around this? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Shane > > > > > > > > >
