Very cool. I like the idea. So we’ll standardize on tagging Jiras with newbie and newbie++
Would anyone have a problem with us doing this? Or can propose an alternate label scheme? Thanks, James On 4/15/16, 1:16 PM, "David Lyle" <[email protected]> wrote: >I've been using: > >newbie for low complexity introductory Jiras: >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-87?jql=project%20%3D%20METRON%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20newbie >newbie++ for medium complexity introductory Jiras: >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-91?jql=project%20%3D%20METRON%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20%22newbie%2B%2B%22 > >In my experience, that's pretty standard. Anything more complex than >newbie++ is just untagged wrt complexity. > >-D... > > > >On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 3:19 PM, James Sirota <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> Hi Guys, >> >> As we are picking up more community members I think we need to start >> tagging Jira’s with “complexity labels” and building up a pool of Jiras >> that newbies can work on. I wanted to open this up to the community to see >> how we wanted to handle that. What should these labels be and how many >> label types would we want [newbie/internmediate/advanced]? How do other >> Apache projects make it easy to onboard new community members? >> >> Thanks, >> James >>
