+ 1.
We should get this documented on the wiki.
> On Apr 16, 2016, at 2:08 PM, James Sirota <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Very cool. I like the idea. So we’ll standardize on tagging Jiras with
> newbie and newbie++
>
> Would anyone have a problem with us doing this? Or can propose an alternate
> label scheme?
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
>
>
>
> On 4/15/16, 1:16 PM, "David Lyle" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I've been using:
>>
>> newbie for low complexity introductory Jiras:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-87?jql=project%20%3D%20METRON%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20newbie
>> newbie++ for medium complexity introductory Jiras:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-91?jql=project%20%3D%20METRON%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20%22newbie%2B%2B%22
>>
>> In my experience, that's pretty standard. Anything more complex than
>> newbie++ is just untagged wrt complexity.
>>
>> -D...
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 3:19 PM, James Sirota <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Guys,
>>>
>>> As we are picking up more community members I think we need to start
>>> tagging Jira’s with “complexity labels” and building up a pool of Jiras
>>> that newbies can work on. I wanted to open this up to the community to see
>>> how we wanted to handle that. What should these labels be and how many
>>> label types would we want [newbie/internmediate/advanced]? How do other
>>> Apache projects make it easy to onboard new community members?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> James
>>>
