This would make the tuning process much more consistent across topologies, so I'm a fan of that approach.
Jon On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:22 PM Casey Stella <[email protected]> wrote: > We moved the parser topologies away from Flux early on, mostly because the > way it was working originally would require separate flux files per > topology. I think that we are, with the current architecture, would be > able to use one flux file for all of the topology (different params, > obviously). Flux is quite configurable and if we could use one flux file > and just have separate configs per parser topology, then I think we might > get the best of both worlds. > > What do you guys think? > -- Jon
