Casey, can you explain the one flux file with separate configurations a little more?
On September 26, 2016 at 12:22:45, Casey Stella ([email protected]) wrote: We moved the parser topologies away from Flux early on, mostly because the way it was working originally would require separate flux files per topology. I think that we are, with the current architecture, would be able to use one flux file for all of the topology (different params, obviously). Flux is quite configurable and if we could use one flux file and just have separate configs per parser topology, then I think we might get the best of both worlds. What do you guys think?
