Agreed! Matt, thanks for taking this on and glad I could help.

M

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Casey Stella <[email protected]> wrote:

> Oh wow, I really like the looks of that.  I was skeptical before, but if
> you got that far in a couple of days, I think this is a worth-while
> endeavor!  Thanks so much Matt!
>
> Casey
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Matt Foley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Jon!  I’m working on characterizing exactly how to fix the two
> > main issues.  I think I’ve got a script that will auto-fix the
> > triple-backtick problem.  The bullet list problem will require
> > hand-editing, so I want to make sure I’ve got the right recommendation.
> >
> > The larger issue is going thru and making the doc content better and more
> > usable.
> > But that can occur over time, and will be motivated by having the book
> > there to gripe about :-)
> >
> > On 1/19/17, 9:05 AM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >     Looking at the screenshot, that would be an incredible improvement on
> > what
> >     we currently have.  I'd be happy to help out with any markdown
> >     modifications and documentation cleanup, if necessary, to fix the
> > problems
> >     you outlined above.
> >
> >     Jon
> >
> >     On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:22 AM Matt Foley <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >     > Sorry, I forgot text-only messages won’t accept attachments.
> Please
> > see
> >     >
> >     > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/
> > 12848335/Metron-book-screenshot.png
> >     >
> >     > Thanks,
> >     > --Matt
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > On 1/19/17, 6:03 AM, "Otto Fowler" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >     >
> >     >     Not seeing the attachment, is it attached to a jira?
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >     On January 19, 2017 at 04:19:02, Matt Foley ([email protected])
> > wrote:
> >     >
> >     >     Here’s a screen shot, attached :-)
> >     >
> >     >     On 1/19/17, 1:04 AM, "Matt Foley" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >     >
> >     >     Hi all,
> >     >     I’ve put together a prototype doc book, along the lines we
> > discussed,
> >     > and
> >     >     it looks pretty worthwhile.
> >     >     Many thanks to Mike M. who whipped the pom.xml file into shape,
> > and
> >     > helped
> >     >     me find the right site.xml file to imitate.
> >     >
> >     >     If you’re interested, please do a single-branch clone as
> follows:
> >     >     git clone --single-branch -b METRON-660
> >     >     https://github.com/mattf-horton/incubator-metron.git
> [clonename]
> >     >     (or whatever git command pleases you :-)
> >     >
> >     >     In this branch, there’s a new top-level subdirectory named
> > site-book/.
> >     > This
> >     >     is not necessarily how we want to integrate stuff, it was just
> >     > convenient
> >     >     to do it separate from the existing site/ directory for now. To
> > build
> >     > the
> >     >     book, do these three commands:
> >     >     cd site-book/
> >     >     bin/generate-md.sh #This gathers all the *.md files into
> >     >     site-book/src/site/markdown/**, and generates the menu tree
> into
> >     >     site-book/src/site/site.xml
> >     >     mvn clean site:site #This builds the book with the maven site
> > plugin
> >     > and
> >     >     doxia-markdown plugin
> >     >
> >     >     If both those steps are successful, you can then go to a
> browser
> > and
> >     > open
> >     >
> >     > file:///Users/yourname/yourpath/clonename/site-book/
> > target/site/index.html
> >     >     and see the book, with the nav menu on the LHS.
> >     >     It’s important to note that a very usable (not perfect) nav
> > hierarchy
> >     > has
> >     >     been auto-generated; this is not hardwired nor hand-edited.
> >     >     I do plan to add some overrides that allow individual items in
> > the
> >     > menu to
> >     >     be tweaked.
> >     >
> >     >     While it already looks fairly nice, and clearly illustrates the
> > value
> >     > of
> >     >     building a book, there are two glaring issues.
> >     >     • Doxia-markdown doesn’t process the triple back-tick (```) the
> > same
> >     > way as
> >     >     Github Markdown. It seems to color-code it as <code>, but
> doesn’t
> >     > preserve
> >     >     line breaks, which is really bad.
> >     >     • Similarly, it only processes bullet lists in isolation, and
> it
> >     > doesn’t
> >     >     correctly combine bullet lists subordinate to a numbered list.
> >     >
> >     >     The upshot is that
> >     >     • both code and bullet lists often lose their linebreaks, and
> get
> >     > mushed
> >     >     into run-on paragraphs, usually combined with the preceding
> > paragraph,
> >     > and
> >     >     • bullet lists interrupt numbered lists and make them start
> over
> > at #1.
> >     >
> >     >     Perhaps 80-90% of these issues can be fixed by editing the
> > markdown
> >     > files
> >     >     to put blank lines around the list formats. I started doing
> > this, but I
> >     >     didn’t want to obscure the proto by editing tons of .md files.
> > As of
> >     > this
> >     >     proto, only the half dozen actually broken files (that caused
> > maven
> >     > site
> >     >     build errors) have been fixed.
> >     >     The other 10-20% will just require simplification of the
> > markdown used,
> >     >     unless we can get an updated version of the plugins.
> >     >
> >     >     Anyway, please take a look and share your thoughts.
> >     >
> >     >     Thanks,
> >     >     --Matt
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >     On 1/16/17, 1:02 PM, "Michael Miklavcic" <
> > [email protected]>
> >     >     wrote:
> >     >
> >     >     Hey Matt, feel free to ping me.
> >     >
> >     >     On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Matt Foley <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >     >
> >     >     > I looked into the Falcon website and doxia over the weekend,
> > and I’m
> >     >     > convinced that using the doxia-markdown plugin should make it
> > dirt
> >     > simple
> >     >     > to do what’s been discussed in this thread, with no overhead
> > on the
> >     > part
> >     >     of
> >     >     > people writing the README.md files.
> >     >     >
> >     >     > I fiddled with trying to do a POC, and unfortunately
> concluded
> >     > (again)
> >     >     > that I don’t really know maven very well :-)
> >     >     > Are there any maven experts out there who would be willing to
> > give me
> >     >     some
> >     >     > pointers (offline) on how to make use of this apparently
> > simple maven
> >     >     > plug-in?
> >     >     >
> >     >     > I can do the bit of scripting needed to gather the docs. I’ve
> > opened
> >     >     > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-660 with some
> >     > sub-tasks for
> >     >     > this work.
> >     >     > --Matt
> >     >     >
> >     >     > On 1/13/17, 12:04 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >     >     >
> >     >     > +1 on any improvement to documentation and more consistency.
> > At this
> >     >     > point, I think getting rid of or hiding some of the pages on
> > the wiki
> >     >     > (at
> >     >     > least for the short term) would be better than leaving them
> > around
> >     >     > because
> >     >     > there's a lot of misinformation.
> >     >     >
> >     >     > Jon
> >     >     >
> >     >     > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:13 AM Nick Allen <
> > [email protected]>
> >     >     > wrote:
> >     >     >
> >     >     > > +1 I think it is sorely needed.
> >     >     > >
> >     >     > > If we can come up with a really slick solution like Spark,
> > then
> >     >     > great. I am
> >     >     > > also not against a half-baked solution that can later
> evolve
> > into
> >     >     > something
> >     >     > > else. For example, create an index README.md that links
> > together
> >     >     > all the
> >     >     > > existing READMEs and run Pandoc on it. Not ideal, but way
> > better
> >     >     > than what
> >     >     > > we have.
> >     >     > >
> >     >     > >
> >     >     > >
> >     >     > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Otto Fowler <
> >     >     > [email protected]>
> >     >     > > wrote:
> >     >     > >
> >     >     > > > I think something that does what you have laid out here,
> no
> >     > matter
> >     >     > the
> >     >     > > > implementation details would be ideal
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > > > On January 12, 2017 at 18:05:24, Matt Foley (
> > [email protected])
> >     >     > wrote:
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > > > We currently have three forms of documentation, with the
> >     > following
> >     >     > > > advantages and disadvantages:
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > > > || Docs || Pro || Con ||
> >     >     > > > | CWiki |
> >     >     > > > Easy to edit, no special tools required, don't have to
> be a
> >     >     > developer to
> >     >     > > > contribute, google and wiki search |
> >     >     > > > Not versioned, no review process, distant from the code,
> > obsolete
> >     >     > content
> >     >     > > > tends to accumulate |
> >     >     > > > | Site |
> >     >     > > > Versioned and reviewed, only committers can edit, google
> > search |
> >     >     > > > Yet another arcane toolset must be learned, only web
> > programmers
> >     >     > feel
> >     >     > > > comfortable contributing, "asf-site" branch not related
> to
> > code
> >     >     > versions,
> >     >     > > > distant from the code, tends to go obsolete due to
> >     > non-maintenance
> >     >     > |
> >     >     > > > | README.md |
> >     >     > > > Versioned and reviewed, only committers can edit, tied to
> > code
> >     >     > versions,
> >     >     > > > highly local to the code being documented |
> >     >     > > > Non-developers don't know about them, may be scared by
> > github,
> >     > poor
> >     >     > > scoring
> >     >     > > > in google search, no high-level presentation |
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > > > Various discussion threads indicate the developer
> > community likes
> >     >     > > > README-based docs, and it's easy to see why from the
> > above. I
> >     >     > propose
> >     >     > > this
> >     >     > > > extension to the README-based documentation, to address
> > their
> >     >     > > > disadvantages:
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > > > 1. Produce a script that gathers the README.md files from
> > all
> >     > code
> >     >     > > > subdirectories into a hierarchical list. The script would
> > have an
> >     >     > > exclusion
> >     >     > > > list for non-user-content, which at this point would
> > consist of
> >     >     > [site/*,
> >     >     > > > build_utils/*]. The hierarchy would be sorted
> depth-first.
> > The
> >     >     > resulting
> >     >     > > > hierarchical list at this time (with six added README
> > files to
> >     >     > complete
> >     >     > > the
> >     >     > > > hierarchy) would be:
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > > > ./README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-analytics/README.md <== (need file here)
> >     >     > > > ./metron-analytics/metron-maas-service/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-analytics/metron-profiler/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-analytics/metron-profiler-client/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-analytics/metron-statistics/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-deployment/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-deployment/amazon-ec2/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-deployment/packaging/README.md <== (need file
> > here)
> >     >     > > > ./metron-deployment/packaging/ambari/README.md <== (need
> > file
> >     >     > here)
> >     >     > > > ./metron-deployment/packaging/
> > docker/ansible-docker/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-deployment/packaging/
> docker/rpm-docker/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-deployment/packer-build/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-deployment/roles/ <== (need file here)
> >     >     > > > ./metron-deployment/roles/kibana/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-deployment/roles/monit/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-deployment/roles/opentaxii/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-deployment/roles/pcap_replay/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-deployment/roles/sensor-test-mode/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-deployment/vagrant/README.md <== (need file
> here)
> >     >     > > > ./metron-deployment/vagrant/codelab-platform/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-deployment/vagrant/
> fastcapa-test-platform/README.
> > md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-deployment/vagrant/full-dev-platform/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-deployment/vagrant/quick-dev-platform/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-platform/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-platform/metron-api/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-platform/metron-common/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-platform/metron-data-management/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-platform/metron-enrichment/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-platform/metron-indexing/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-platform/metron-management/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-platform/metron-parsers/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-platform/metron-pcap-backend/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-sensors/README.md <== (need file here)
> >     >     > > > ./metron-sensors/fastcapa/README.md
> >     >     > > > ./metron-sensors/pycapa/README.md
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > > > 2. Arrange to run this script as part of the build
> > process, and
> >     >     > commit
> >     >     > > the
> >     >     > > > resulting hierarchy list to someplace in the versioned
> and
> >     > branched
> >     >     > > ./site/
> >     >     > > > subdirectory.
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > > > 3. Produce a "doc reader" web page that takes in this
> > hierarchy
> >     > of
> >     >     > .md
> >     >     > > > pages, and presents a LHS doc tree of links, and a main
> > display
> >     >     > area for
> >     >     > > a
> >     >     > > > currently selected file. If we want to get fancy, this
> > page would
> >     >     > also
> >     >     > > > provide: (a) telescoping (collapse/expand) of the doc
> > tree; (b)
> >     >     > floating
> >     >     > > > next/prev/up/home buttons in the display area.
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > > > #4. Add to this web page a pull-down menu that selects
> > among all
> >     >     > the
> >     >     > > > release versions of Metron, and (if not running in the
> > Apache
> >     >     > site) a
> >     >     > > > SNAPSHOT version for the current filesystem version (for
> >     > developer
> >     >     > > > preview). Let it re-write the file paths per release
> > version to
> >     > the
> >     >     > > proper
> >     >     > > > release tag in github. This web page will therefore be
> >     >     > > version-independent.
> >     >     > > > Put it in the asf-site branch of the Apache site, as the
> > new
> >     > "docs"
> >     >     > > > sub-site from the home web page. Update the list of
> > releases at
> >     >     > each
> >     >     > > > release, or if we want to get fancy, teach it to read the
> > release
> >     >     > tags
> >     >     > > from
> >     >     > > > github.
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > > > 5. As part of the release process, the release manager
> (a)
> >     > assures
> >     >     > the
> >     >     > > > release is tagged in github with a consistent naming
> > convention,
> >     >     > and (b)
> >     >     > > > submits the new hierarchy of links to google search
> > (there's an
> >     >     > api for
> >     >     > > > that).
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > > > 6. Deprecate the use of cwiki for anything but long-lived
> >     >     > > > demonstrations/tutorials that are unlikely to go
> obsolete.
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > > > Do folks feel this would be a good contribution to the
> >     > visibility,
> >     >     > > > timeliness, and usability of our docs?
> >     >     > > > Is this an adequate solution for the current problems?
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > > > Thanks,
> >     >     > > > --Matt
> >     >     > > >
> >     >     > >
> >     >     > >
> >     >     > >
> >     >     > > --
> >     >     > > Nick Allen <[email protected]>
> >     >     > >
> >     >     > --
> >     >     >
> >     >     > Jon
> >     >     >
> >     >     > Sent from my mobile device
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > --
> >
> >     Jon
> >
> >     Sent from my mobile device
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to