Hello everybody, this means that it is not an apache.org project anymore? BR, Giorgio
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Libre de virus. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> 2017-11-07 9:42 GMT+01:00 Simeon Aladjem <[email protected]>: > Hello, > > To the best of my understanding, the current problem with the project is > the hinted move of the milagro-crypto repository to a different GitHub > organization. > I think that won't be a problem anymore, since the intention to make this > move was suspended. > > Together with that, we do want to contribute a new crypto code, which > doesn't fit into the current repository, as it presents a missive change > from the current one. > We intend to propose in the near future few changes in the project > code-base and repositories. > > Best, > Simeon Aladjem > MIRACL > > On 6/11/17, 15:07, "John D. Ament" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry, I don't fully understand your response. > > Where do you want this project to go? I know from an IPMC standpoint, > I'm concerned that you moved development away from the ASF. > > John > > On 2017-10-29 08:29, "Go Yamamoto" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am wondering why this project does not go. We have a set of MFA > server/client and an ID-based crypt library that actually work fine. We > have been working for the code and are willing to donate the code. It > sounds like a quite unreasonable story. > > > > I think we should start from releasing the library part and fix the > API for the library. > > What is the blocker? Should we restart the project? > > > > Regards, > > Go Yamamoto > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: John D. Ament [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 7:35 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: State of Milagro > > > > Hi All, > > > > Last month, as noted in email, your board report was removed due to > questions being raised and lack of mentor sign off. > > > > The IPMC looks for a response from you considering the questions > raised by Dave Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign off on your > report explicitly. You cannot add their sign off. > > > > John > > > > > > > >
