Robert, as for now, the MINA coding rules are pretty much the ADS coding rules, which are documented here :
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxDEV/Coding+standards But as MINA is now a standalone TLP, it may diverge a little bit ;) Emmanuel On 11/16/06, Robert Greig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 16/11/06, Julien Vermillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know some MINA commiter (most?) don't like the current code formating > rules inherited from ADS. It could make integration of patch and > contributors easier. > > So perhaps we can change to std java formating rules for trunk (2.0) ? I think MINA has very consistent coding standards. They aren't the ones I typically use but they are consistent and clear which to me is the most important thing about coding standards. Reformatting every file just creates lots of false diffs which is not something I like. I would say it would be nice if a MINA wiki page documented the coding standards for clarity. But I am of course not a committer on this project. RG
-- Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny
