I just don't understand the graphing of jmeter. Some people get nice pretty graphs, and I just seem to get garbled graphs that look meaningless. The other problem I have with jmeter is that to extend jmeter takes much more work that I think is necessary. I tried to write an SMTP send tester and it took forever and still did not work.
On 3/8/07, Monajit Choudhury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tried grinder, but its not as versatile as jmeter. I would go for Jmeter. I have done some loadtesting of the MINA examples thru jmeter it did pretty well. Regds Monajit -----Original Message----- From: James Im [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 10:05 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: testing mina another testing tool: Grinder http://grinder.sourceforge.net/ Mark Webb wrote: >exactly. > >I think we should agree on a test tool and write test plans that can go >into >the baseline. > > >On 3/8/07, James Im <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>Mark Webb wrote: >> >What does everyone use to test the throughput/load/etc of MINA. I have >> >always had a love/hate relationship with jmeter, and wondered if anyone >> >uses >> >anything else. >> > >> >Thank you. >> > >> >>I think that Mina should have some performance tests included so that >>code changes' impact on performance can be evaluated. >> >>With some tests, you can test on the previous version and the newer one >>and see the relative difference. >> >>I don't answer your question I know. >> >>_________________________________________________________________ >>Ta' pÃ¥ udsalg Ã¥ret rundt pÃ¥ MSN Shopping: http://shopping.msn.dk - >>her >>finder du altid de bedste priser >> >> > > _________________________________________________________________ Del dine store filer uden problemer på MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.dk/
-- ..Cheers Mark
