On 5/5/07, Ashish Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i think have a constant size header which will contain payload length for rest of message.
I agree, this is very easy to implement. On 5/5/07, mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone help me out with my protocol design? Is it better to design > protocol as a fixed length or non fixed length? What I meant is fixed lenght > message(for instance 512bytes) for each message? Non fixed length means the > message size could be big. Which method is better? If fixed length, i faced > a problem. How to reassembly the message since message is cut into the > piece? >
