Hi, MINA started a new trend in NIO based frameworks. It's elegant and I am sure it can be further optimized for performance. What I care now is how easily I can integrate it into my application and MINA with new enhancements seems to be quite cool in this job.
And it's Apache! On 5/24/07, Adam Fisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The slides were just posted from this Java One session claiming Grizzly blows MINA away performance-wise, and I'm just curious as to people's views on it. They present some interesting ideas about optimizing selector threading and ByteBuffer use. http://developers.sun.com/learning/javaoneonline/j1sessn.jsp?sessn=TS-2992&yr=2007&track=5 Maybe someone could comment on the performance improvements in MINA 2.0? It might also be useful to look at Grizzlies techniques to see if MINA could incorporate them. I know at least Scott Oaks from Grizzly is a solid performance guy, so their numbers are likely correct. Quick note: I'm not trying to spark a Grizzly/MINA battle by any means. I just started using MINA after having implemented several generic NIO frameworks myself, and I absolutely love MINA's approach. It allowed me to code a STUN server in 2 days, and I'm porting my SIP server now. Thanks, Adam
-- Ersin
