On 6/12/07, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey this is great. We can simply just define the proper store interfaces as
you have
done. I think we can achieve what you need but really if you need to start
a lab project
for it do so. If you want to help out with the Directory DNS project then
you're welcome
to just commit to it. I guess you still have commit rights to Directory
since when MINA
was hosted there.
Also we should bring up all the ADS interfaces to MINA 2.0. I think this is
good for ADS and good for MINA. I spoke to some of the directory peeps
about this
and we're ready to do it. Trustin told me MINA 2.0 may have a significant
performance impact as well. If so we should make the move and start testing
with
it. Directory and MINA have good effects on one another that benefits the
entire
community at large.
Please note MINA 2.0 has very many issues to resolve. I think it's
not even close to its first milestone because of a few critical issues
to be fixed. I never recommend you to migrate to MINA 2.0 just
because of DNS.
Trustin
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
