Hi community,
Currently, there are two protocol implementation submodules;
protocol-client-http and protocol-server-http. Their package names
are respectively org.apache.mina.http.client and
org.apache.mina.http.server. As you see, they have a different naming
rule from the artifactId. It would be better if we can align this.
Personally I prefer protocol-http-{client,server}.
Additionally, what do you think about changing the base package name
of all protocol implementations to org.apache.mina.protocol? For
example, http client implementation's package name could be
org.apache.mina.protocol.http.client.
Your feed back is appreciated in advance.
Trustin
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
