hi Trustin
On 9/13/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi community,
>
> Currently, there are two protocol implementation submodules;
> protocol-client-http and protocol-server-http. Their package names
> are respectively org.apache.mina.http.client and
> org.apache.mina.http.server. As you see, they have a different naming
> rule from the artifactId. It would be better if we can align this.
> Personally I prefer protocol-http-{client,server}.
>
+1
Additionally, what do you think about changing the base package name
> of all protocol implementations to org.apache.mina.protocol? For
> example, http client implementation's package name could be
> org.apache.mina.protocol.http.client.
>
totally agreed with your suggestion. as we move ahead, proper naming
conventions at the package level is very important and useful.
Your feed back is appreciated in advance.
>
> Trustin
> --
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/
> --
> PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
>
--
/usr/local/tyronne
ändern ist gewesen geändert worden
