+1...renaming it would be good. When I explain it...I have to be very careful in saying "I mean Mina's ByteBuffer..not a regular ByteBuffer"
Jeff Trustin Lee wrote: > Hi folks, > > It is often confusing to discriminate MINA ByteBuffer and NIO > ByteBuffer. Do we need renaming? I didn't have much difficulties > actually because most Java code doesn't use both types at the same > time. > > There was an opinion about renaming it to MinaByteBuffer, but I don't > think it's the best name available for us. I think DataBuffer, > ExtendedByteBuffer, ExtendedBuffer or just Buffer might also be a > candidate. There's Buffer in NIO, too, but nobody uses that class > directly. > > I'd like to find the best name; short and not confusing one. Please > don't hesitate to respond to this message with your idea so we can > find out the best alternative. > > Trustin
