Alex Karasulu wrote: > Hi, > > Please excuse the cross post but it's quite necessary. Furthermore people > should not feel like they cannot cross post responses so please feel free. > > It looks like the two versions of the http client based on MINA are starting > to diverge. I've noticed the other day that some of the fixes for bugs > already solved by one group are being re-implement all over again over again > by another. It's a shame to have that happen so perhaps we can take some > concrete steps to prevent this divergence from progressing. > > As a first step I've cleaned up and restructured the Asyncweb code base and > posted this email here on the new directory structure in Subversion: > > *http://tinyurl.com/ypmbd3 > > *So I'm sending out this cross post in the hopes of bringing the two groups > together as one unified community which apparently has the same goal in > mind: a fast low-resource consuming asynchronous http client. What ever it > takes, I'm sure the MINA PMC is more than willing to accommodate. If you > have trusted committers already working on this in the Geronimo community > there is no reason why we cannot trust them to continue working on it here > at MINA's Asyncweb project. Let's open up discussions on this.
I totally agree with Alex on this. It looks there are fixes in the G branch that haven't made it to the MINA branch. How can bridge the gap in communication as well as the gap in bug fixing? My opinion is that we need to stop all work on the G sandbox branch and move all work over to MINA. Is there anything impeding that? ...besides a lot of work merging the changes... -Mike
