I found some computer parts,I'll try to assemble some kind of server for
running serial test.
Julien
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:03:13 -0500
이희승 "(Trustin Lee)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> LoL! That would be fantastic. :)
>
> 2008-02-13 (수), 10:54 +0100, Julien Vermillard 쓰시길:
> > Hi
> > BTW is it possible to have an ASF machine with two serial port
> > wired in loop-back for being able to run automated serial transport
> > tests ?
> >
> > Julien
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 04:47:40 -0500
> > "Alex Karasulu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I can provide such a lab. I just cannot reveal the contributing
> > > party. If you and others are interested please contact me
> > > offline. We've been trying to prepare a high concurrency
> > > environment for ApacheDS specifically so we can share this with
> > > MINA. We just need a solid plan for the infrastructure.
> > >
> > > Alex
> > >
> > > On Feb 13, 2008 4:18 AM, 이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Oh yeah, that's a good idea. We have been stepping on the
> > > > accelerator for a very long time to implement new features and
> > > > improve performance, so it seems like it's time to take care of
> > > > stability.
> > > >
> > > > One problem is that most bug reports these days are not easy to
> > > > reproduce, which means they are related with high concurrency
> > > > situation and unit tests cannot be the way to find many
> > > > potential bugs, although CircularQueue issue is probably
> > > > detectable by a unit test.
> > > >
> > > > The best solution would be to have a kind of regression test lab
> > > > within the ASF so we can run some exhaustive tests preiodically
> > > > and share the facility with other projects like HTTPD and
> > > > Directory. I don't think it will happen soon though.
> > > >
> > > > Anyways, we need to raise the coverage rate on and on.
> > > >
> > > > 2008-02-13 (수), 03:23 -0500, Alex Karasulu 쓰시길:
> > > > > I've been noticing and hearing many complaints about the
> > > > > amount of tests
> > > > and
> > > > > overall coverage in the MINA code base. If there was more
> > > > > coverage contributors and committers would feel much more
> > > > > comfortable making
> > > > changes
> > > > > knowing they're not going to break something.
> > > > >
> > > > > At some point we need to stop growing the code base like mad
> > > > > and just
> > > > start
> > > > > documenting and thoroughly testing the code. Otherwise as we
> > > > > grow the barrier of entry into the heart of MINA especially
> > > > > will increase.
> > > > >
> > > > > Alex
> > > > >
> > > > > On Feb 13, 2008 12:00 AM, 이희승 (Trustin Lee)
> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > 2008-02-01 (금), 13:57 +0100, Emmanuel Lecharny 쓰시길:
> > > > > > > Makoto YUI wrote:
> > > > > > > > I have the same problem to you.
> > > > > > > > I'm using the latest snapshot (
> > > > > > mina-core-2.0.0-M1-20080124.103130-116.jar).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > | java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
> > > > > > > > | at
> > > > > > > > org.apache.mina.util.CircularQueue.shrinkIfNeeded(
> > > > CircularQueue.java
> > > > > > :233)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This problem caused when newLen is less than the length
> > > > > > > > of System.arraycopy().
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > | Object[] tmp = new Object[newLen];
> > > > > > > > | ..
> > > > > > > > | if (first < last) {
> > > > > > > > | System.arraycopy(items, first, tmp, 0,
> > > > > > > > last -
> > > > first);
> > > > > > > > * bug
> > > > > > > > | } else {
> > > > > > > > | System.arraycopy(items, first, tmp, 0,
> > > > > > > > oldLen -
> > > > > > first); *
> > > > > > > > bug
> > > > > > > > | System.arraycopy(items, 0, tmp, oldLen
> > > > > > > > - first,
> > > > > > last); *
> > > > > > > > bug
> > > > > > > > | }
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It seems to be preferred to use java.util.LinkedList
> > > > > > > > instead of
> > > > custom
> > > > > > > > CircularQueue
> > > > > > > > for messageQueue(s) in
> > > > > > > > AbstractProtocolEncoderOutput/AbstractProtocolDecoderOutput.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Makoto YUI
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I don't think that it's a problem to use our own brewed
> > > > CircularQueue
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I looked at the code, and I'm a little bit annoyed that
> > > > > > > there is absolutely no comment at all. There is a clear
> > > > > > > bug somewhere, as you
> > > > got
> > > > > > > a java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException (and many
> > > > > > > thanks for
> > > > having
> > > > > > > posting this mail, btw !!!), but without a knowledge about
> > > > > > > what is
> > > > doing
> > > > > > > this class, it's really difficult to find a fix in 2
> > > > > > > minutes. This should not be the case...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Btw, there is no test cases either...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I wrote that evil code hehe. :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There's test case for CircularQueue in 1.x branch, but it
> > > > > > was removed from the trunk when I replace it with
> > > > > > LinkedList. After then, I realized the CircularQueue
> > > > > > implementation performs better than LinkedList, so I
> > > > > > resurrected it. However, I forgot to resurrect the test
> > > > > > case together. Will take care of this when I get back
> > > > > > home. -- what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > http://gleamynode.net/
> > > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > > > --
> > > > http://gleamynode.net/
> > > >
