Alan D. Cabrera wrote: <snip> > This seems like a good idea. I have some questions. > > When we cut a release of this code, what version will it be? What will > be its Maven group and artifact id? > > What about the other AsyncWeb client? It looks like people are > modifying that quite heavily. Are we going to need to do a pre-2.0 > release of that as well?
Now you're asking hard questions that I'm not sure I have a good answer for. I think this will take some discussing. To get the discussion started, I'll suggest that for AHC we use the Maven group 'org.apache.asyncweb' and for the artifact id we use 'ahc'. For the version, how about 1.0? For AsyncWeb client, I think we should use the group 'org.apache.asyncweb' and the artifact id 'client'. -Mike
