2008-02-26 (화), 22:48 +0200, Eero Nevalainen 쓰시길: > 이희승 (Trustin Lee) wrote: > > 2008-02-26 (화), 15:32 +0100, Emmanuel Lecharny 쓰시길: > >> ??? (Trustin Lee) wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> As we already moved AsyncWeb to /repos/asf/mina/asyncweb, I think it > >>> also makes sense to move > >>> > >>> * /repos/asf/mina/(trunk|branches|tags|all) to /repos/asf/mina/mina > >>> * /repos/asf/mina/sandbox/ftpserver to /repos/asf/mina/ftpserver > >>> > >>> WDYT? mina/mina sounds somewhat funny but I can't think of any better > >>> name for now. :) > >>> > >> +1. > >> > >> /repos/asf/mina/core ? > > > > Then we have repos/asf/mina/core/trunk/core :D > > > > Ok... how about mina/kernel for the "main" MINA? It dodges the double > name issue somewhat. > (of course we can argue whether mina/core/trunk/kernel is a better order > than mina/kernel/trunk/core) :)
Kernal sounds kinda cool, but I'm not sure it's the exact representation of what we got. It seems like everyone is fine with the current directory structure (i.e. mina at repos/mina/ and others at repos/mina/<subproject>/). > mina/main would of course have been a good solution if it didn't suck so > much. Almost certain to mistype and misread :P mina/main/src/main/org/apache/mina? :) Cheers, -- Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
