On Mar 7, 2008, at 2:33 AM, 이희승 (Trustin Lee) wrote:
2008-02-26 (화), 22:48 +0200, Eero Nevalainen 쓰시길:
이희승 (Trustin Lee) wrote:
2008-02-26 (화), 15:32 +0100, Emmanuel Lecharny 쓰시길:
??? (Trustin Lee) wrote:
Hi,
As we already moved AsyncWeb to /repos/asf/mina/asyncweb, I
think it
also makes sense to move
* /repos/asf/mina/(trunk|branches|tags|all) to /repos/asf/mina/
mina
* /repos/asf/mina/sandbox/ftpserver to /repos/asf/mina/ftpserver
WDYT? mina/mina sounds somewhat funny but I can't think of any
better
name for now. :)
+1.
/repos/asf/mina/core ?
Then we have repos/asf/mina/core/trunk/core :D
Ok... how about mina/kernel for the "main" MINA? It dodges the double
name issue somewhat.
(of course we can argue whether mina/core/trunk/kernel is a better
order
than mina/kernel/trunk/core) :)
Kernal sounds kinda cool, but I'm not sure it's the exact
representation
of what we got. It seems like everyone is fine with the current
directory structure (i.e. mina at repos/mina/ and others at
repos/mina/<subproject>/).
How about foundation?
mina/foundation/trunk/core
Regards,
Alan
