On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:47:33 -0400 "Alex Karasulu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Julien Vermillard wrote: > > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:53:03 +0100 > > > Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> Frédéric Brégier wrote: > > >> > > >>> Those numbers are useful in production... (at least for my case) > > >>> I know, it's only about statistics but some people want them... > > >>> > > >>> If I follow your idea, what will return > > >>> IoService.getStatistics() ? > > >>> > > >>> > > >> I guess that Peter meant something like : getStatistics( > > >> IoSession.GET_MANAGED_SESSION_COUNT ), etc. > > >> > > >> Then you have your stats, _and_ you don't clutter the API with > > >> dozens of additional methods. > > >> > > >> Otherwise, what about using JMX for such stats ? > > >> > > >> > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > heh I don't think JMX should be mandatory for having access to > > > stats. And you talk about bloat ? ;) > > > > > Well, JMX is pretty transversal... We can't say it's a bloat :) > > > > Anyway, it was just a proposal :) > > > > JMX is just a way to access this information which still needs to be > stored somewhere in some statistics object. JMX won't instantly give > us the statistics variables. > > I like Peter's idea of having a statistics object to contain > instance/accumulated stats. BTW I don't think we need to create this > object everytime the stats are queried. The object can be created > once and reused. Hence getStatistics() will always return the same > object instance, and MINA will just update values in it. > > Alex So it's very cosmetic. Perhaps we could vote it for see what are user preferences ? Julien
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
