Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" wrote: >> The source link sounds good. >> >> What about using the old wiki site which can be edited by everyone? > This is, IMHO, not a good idea. Having two wikis is killing : none of > them will be up to date... >> We >> could use it as a kind of sandbox and copy some pages when they become >> mature. Otherwise, We could create a dedicated CWiki space which allows >> all logged-in users can edit. > Isn't MINA wiki writable by alll our committers? If not, it should. For > external users (ie, not -yet- committers), no, we can't open the gates, > AFAIK.
It's writable by all committers + asf-clas group for non-committing documentation contributors who've sent CLAs. I talked about a dedicated separate CWiki because we can't open the gate for the Cwiki space for auto-exporting. Using the old wiki is also a problem because of the different syntax. > So I think that for users who want to provide documentation, the best > (and only way, I guess) is currently to submit patches through JIRA. Isn't it inconvenient to use JIRA to attract more people in documentation effort? We already have a documentation component in our JIRA, so we could promote it in our web site anyway. Probably what we need is something like launchpad? It could be a labs project. Or.. we could also encourage users to use the comment feature? -- Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
