> "ì´í¬ì¹ (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" wrote: >> It's writable by all committers + asf-clas group for non-committing >> documentation contributors who've sent CLAs. > Ok. Just wanted to be sure ... >> I talked about a dedicated >> separate CWiki because we can't open the gate for the Cwiki space for >> auto-exporting. Using the old wiki is also a problem because of the >> different syntax. >> > Yep. >> >>> So I think that for users who want to provide documentation, the best >>> (and only way, I guess) is currently to submit patches through JIRA. >>> >> >> Isn't it inconvenient to use JIRA to attract more people in >> documentation effort? We already have a documentation component in our >> JIRA, so we could promote it in our web site anyway. >> > This is also an option. The problem with the way we work is that as > karma is granted on merit, it's hard to establish merit from people who > have not submitted any material :) So, yes, it's not convenient, but > this is the way we work. > > Anyway, even a pdf proposal attached in a JIRA is ok, as soon as we can > inject it on our site. The idea is that writing doco does not depend on > the container. What is important is the content :) > > Hi,
I think we should multiply JIRA issues for documentation, so it's easier to attach patch and it's probblly more easy to contribute to a small doco issues than a big overall tutorial. my 2 cents, Julien (back in 2 weeks)
