> -----Original Message----- > From: Emmanuel Lecharny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Emmanuel Lecharny > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 10:23 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Current state of 2.0 > > Craig L. Ching wrote: > > Hi all, > > > Hi Craig, > > I've been sort of following some of the discussions of the proposed > > changes and I like what I'm hearing. In fact, I'd love it > if someone > > could say how soon I could expect to see a release of all the good > > ideas > > ;-) > > > Well, soon ... :) We don't have any deadline, we are just > processing tasks as fast as we can. > > However, as it's a volunteer effort, we have a limited time, > but the good point is that we welcome any help ! > > So if you feel like you can give us a hand to deliver 2.0 > earlier, you are very welcome :)
Of course ;-) I'll probably be more involved in testing it once it's ready though :-P > > Anyway, I'm coming back to a project that I had originally working > > with > > 1.1.6 and had converted to 2.0 M1, but found a problem with > that that > > was promptly fixed on trunk at the time, around 17 March, 2008. My > > code worked with trunk then and what I'm wondering is what > the chances > > are that it will still work? Have any of the big changes > you've all > > been talking about been put on the trunk yet? I appreciate any > > feedback, I know you're all busy, and if I don't hear > anything, I'll > > just give it my best shot, but I do appreciate any > information I can get. > > > 2.0-M1 is just a milestone. Things can change before we get > to 2.0-RC1, which will see the API frozen. Until then, it's > really likely that some refactoring could occur. So keep watching :) > Yeah, I'm just wondering if there have been any commits yet that have fundamentally changed the API's (ByteBuffer in particular) that might "get" me if you know what I mean. I'm fine with the changes I'm hearing, don't get me wrong, I'm just trying to quantify (very loosely speaking) the work I'll have to do when I do an svn update and build ;-) Thanks for the reply! > Thanks ! > > > -- > -- > cordialement, regards, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > directory.apache.org > > > Cheers, Craig
