On Jun 6, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Craig L. Ching wrote:
Yeah, I'm just wondering if there have been any commits yet that have fundamentally changed the API's (ByteBuffer in particular) that might "get" me if you know what I mean. I'm fine with the changes I'm hearing, don't get me wrong, I'm just trying to quantify (very loosely speaking) the work I'll have to do when I do an svn update and build ;-) Thanks for the reply!
The fundamental changes to the IoBuffer API very likely won't happen for 2.0, since 2.0 is close to being complete.
At this stage, I think the best approach will be for the community to get 2.0 out the door, and then we can look at more radical API changes for 3.0..
-pete -- (peter.royal|osi)@pobox.com - http://fotap.org/~osi
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
