On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:44:44 +0000 (GMT) Edouard De Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't know the code underneath VmPipe but is it possible to quickly > rewrite it using blocking queues thus using new JDK abilities and > reducing the codebase as seems to suggest Emm ? > > Kind of mixed approach to please everyone :) > Good idea, but does it's really hurting anyone to delete the whole thing ? :) > Cordialement, Regards, > -Edouard De Oliveira- > http://tedorg.free.fr/en/main.php > > > > > ________________________________ > De : Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > À : [email protected] > Envoyé le : Jeudi, 6 Novembre 2008, 16h34mn 20s > Objet : Re: poll VmPipe > > Dan Creswell wrote: > > Hmmm, if VmPipe is done right it should allow me to build an > > app/service on top of MINA that can easily be tested all inside of > > a single JVM (good for unit testing amongst other things) or > > deployed fully networked with minimum code disruption. > > > Well, if you just use VmPipe to unit test your deployed networked > development, then I think that the potential improvement you may gain > from avoiding an encoding/decoding call is irrelevant. More than > that, I would expect my unit test to behave as the real program > works, ie using the sockets instead of a fake communication inside > the JVM. > > AFAIR, the base idea was to eliminate the need to use sockets to > exchange data between two threads in the same JVM. Blocking queues > are ok for such purpose those days, no ? > > -- -- > cordialement, regards, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > directory.apache.org > > >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
